My 2016 horror moldy oldie: Edward Page Mitchell, The Crystal Man

It’s time for the annual “moldy oldie” reading, when I dig up some generally forgotten writer’s horror stories to read for Halloween. This year, Paula Cappa,  an award-winning writer and blogger, introduced me to the stories of Edward Page Mitchell, so I read the groundbreaking 1973 collection of his stories by Sam Moskowitz, The Crystal Man. I thank her for doing so. For, while the collection is short on horrors, it’s a fascinating look at the nebulous borderline between fake news and fiction.

Edward Page Mitchell

Edward Page Mitchell

So who was Edward Page Mitchell (1852-1927)? According to Moskowitz, who must be given credit for rediscovering him, Mitchell was the missing link in American science fiction, the man who bridged the gap between Verne and Wells, and probably influenced the latter. Alas, while Moskowitz was a noted researcher of the roots of American science fiction, he let his enthusiasm run away with him at times. For example, crediting Mitchell’s “The Tachypomp” as the first story of faster-than-light travel overlooks the fact that it does not take into account relativistic effects, no surprise since the theory of special relativity wouldn’t be invented for another 31 years.

In 1835, the Moon was not a harsh mistress!

In 1835, the Moon was not a harsh mistress!

A better way of understanding Mitchell is to see him as a newspaper editor and writer of the late nineteenth century. Mitchell spent most of his life (1874-1926) at the New York Sun, the first successful penny newspaper in America when it was founded in 1833. In those days, newspapers had to entertain as well as inform. And one of the ways they entertained was to create what appeared to be news stories about strange events. Perhaps they were true, perhaps they weren’t. In fact, one of the Sun’s greatest successes was the famous Moon-man hoax of 1835, in which the real astronomer John Herschel was purported to have seen flying man-like creatures on the moon.

One can see this influence directly in some of Mitchell’s tales. “The Story of the Deluge” begins just like a genuine news story, only to switch to humor and political satire along the way. “The Soul Spectroscope” begins likewise, though the use of “Prof. Dummkopf” as its subject tips off the readers immediately. Not surprisingly, several of his stories develop an idea just a little bit and end abruptly, convenient to fill in some space in a newspaper, but unsatisfying as a tale. “The Tachypomp” is passed off as a dream, while “The Soul Spectroscope” implies at the end that its protagonist is a madman. And a few bits are didactic essays that remind me of Mark Twain, another journalist-turned-writer. I could imagine him writing “The Devil’s Funeral” instead of Mitchell.

Can't have a time-traveling clock without a clock-maker! (Source: Wikipedia/Wellcome Images)

Can’t have a time-traveling clock without a clock-maker!
(Source: Wikipedia/Wellcome Images)

And yet, Mitchell wrote some pieces that qualify as genuine, well-developed stories, and deserve much of Sam Moskowitz’s praise. “The Clock That Went Backward” really is an elegant story about time-travel paradoxes, even if the “science” behind it is left unexplained. And “The Crystal Man” is a decent invisible man story, in which an innovative technology leads to human tragedy. Better yet, while Mitchell was prone to using many of the hackneyed romantic tropes of his era, to the detriment of his stories, in “The Crystal Man,” he gives one of them a sharp twist that brings it to a startling conclusion.

So what of horror stories? To judge from this collection, Mitchell preferred his horror with a leavening of humor. “The Cave of the Spurgles” and “The Flying Weathercock” are stories which in other hands could have been good horror stories, but Mitchell’s design in the first case and his exposition in the second deprive either story of any frights. And appearances of Judas Iscariot are not as shocking to 21st century sensibilities as they were to the 19th, which lessens the impact of such stories as “The Devilish Rat.”

Yet there are stories which can give one the shivers. Mitchell tackled the subject of conjoined souls twice, and while his story of the Dow twins is marred at the end by his humor, that and the story of the Fancher twins are both eerie considerations of human nature. “The Facts in the Ratcliffe Case” begins innocently enough, and is slow to build up, but pays off in its concluding pages by revealing a human monster. And while “An Uncommon Sort of Spectre” is, despite its name, a common enough ghost story, I appreciate the twist Mitchell gives it.

What is more intriguing to me is that some of Mitchell’s stories have horrific implications that may not have been obvious to his readers, or even to himself. “The Ablest Man in the World” is meant to be a story about advanced technology and human nature, but on second thought can be read as a lesson on how human fears can frustrate noble goals. And “The Senator’s Daughter” has an awful lesson about race prejudice (expected) and sexism (unintentional) at its conclusion.

While it was short on horrors, The Crystal Man was an entertaining read. The British magazine The Fortean Times has been covering these borderline “news” stories for years as curiosities in journalism. It was illuminating to get another angle on late 19th century newspaper journalism, to see how “fake news” could so easily slide into science fiction and fantasy. So thanks, Paula!


About Brian Bixby

I enjoy history because it helps me understand people. I'm writing fiction for much the same reason.
This entry was posted in Reading fiction, Reviews and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to My 2016 horror moldy oldie: Edward Page Mitchell, The Crystal Man

  1. crimsonprose says:

    Oh, woe, gone are the days when the science in such stories didn’t have to be thoroughly explicable!

    • Judy says:

      Boy is that true!! The God of the Gap referring to that space not answered by science still in the awesome realm of the divine, walks hand in hand with a Gap in Science too…that place that hovers between the tested and proven and the yet to be proved. Nothing is sacred these days!! Ah but to tremble on the threshold of understanding…what a mysterious and exciting place to stand!!

      • Brian Bixby says:

        There are two issues here with relation to Mitchell’s work.

        First, I suspect Mitchell had to write to fit his newspaper’s needs, which meant he could not actually go into detail about scientific principles, even if he had wanted to.

        Second, the less science content in science fiction, the less likely it is to be called science fiction, especially in the early years. After all, what’s the difference between becoming invisible due to a genie’s spell or due to a (in fact impossible) chemical process? The latter pretends to be rooted in science. But there’s a point where the roots in science are so thin, we might as well regard the mechanisms as fantasies instead.

        • Judy says:

          Well I do suppose that the most believable fantasies have plausible explanations so that the reader isn’t jarred harshly out of the story. You want that tingle of wonder and the suspension of utter disbelief, with some kind of hook whether science (even if highly extrapolated) or even common superstition or legend to carry it along.

          • Brian Bixby says:

            Which is one of the reasons why the morality play works: God, or some equivalent religious and moral power, takes an hand to reward the innocent and punish the guilty. Only God can’t be a deus ex machina!

      • crimsonprose says:

        I couldn’t have put it half so poetically.

  2. sarij says:

    Two years ago I read a fascinating book titled “The sun and the Moon”. It was not only a great look into the Sun’s hoax, it was a highly educational look at the history of American newspapers. I’d say it was far easier to fool people back then because the general public did’t know better but I’d be lying.

  3. Paula Cappa says:

    Fascinating post today. I learned so much about Mitchell. Thank you!

  4. Judy says:

    What a delightful write up. You always make me sorry about all the older science fiction, ghost stories or authors I never discovered nor read!! This was fun so now to read a bit of Mitchell myself when I can!! 🙂

    • Brian Bixby says:

      Since his stories are in the public domain, there are several paperback and electronic editions of some of his stories out there today. The work I used has a LONG introduction by Moskowitz placing Mitchell in a historical and literary context, but it contains many spoilers, and should probably be read only after reading Mitchell’s stories.

  5. Much better written than the intro to him that I read and linked in my What’s Up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s